Until the 1990s, the criterion for appropriate vitamin D nutrition was simply the absence of overt rickets or osteomalacia (Blumberg et al., 1963). Now, circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations are the appropriate measure of vitamin D nutritional status (Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes, 1997). It is now possible to make more quantitative comparisons of vitamin D nutrition through primate and human evolution, and to draw inferences about how differences in vitamin D nutrition may have affected susceptibility to disease.
CITATION STYLE
Vieth, R. (2003). Effects of Vitamin D on Bone and Natural Selection of Skin Color: How Much Vitamin D Nutrition are We Talking About? In Bone Loss and Osteoporosis (pp. 139–154). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8891-1_9
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.