Separate visual pathways for perception of actions and objects: Evidence from a case of apperceptive agnosia

24Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recognition of different kinds of visual stimuli was studied in a patient who acquired apperceptive visual agnosia after a bilateral occipitotemporal lesion which partially spared the primary visual cortex. Impairment in recognising static objects perceived visually sharply contrasts with the relatively well preserved ability to recognise objects from gestures illustrating their use, and to recognise actions shown in line drawings. It is suggested that the occipitoparieto-frontal pathway is involved in the recognition of actions, and in the recognition of objects when sensorimotor experience is evoked.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity

4973Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Separate visual pathways for perception and action

4772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Action recognition in the premotor cortex

3738Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Specificity of action representations in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex

89Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Imaging A Cognitive Model of Apraxia: The Substrate of Gesture-Specific Cognitive Processes

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subdivision of the occipital lobes: An anatomical and functional MRI connectivity study

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, C. T., Ceccaldi, M., Giusiano, B., & Poncet, M. (1998). Separate visual pathways for perception of actions and objects: Evidence from a case of apperceptive agnosia. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 65(3), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.65.3.382

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

54%

Researcher 14

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 31

57%

Neuroscience 12

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free