Effects of hand proximity and movement direction in spatial and temporal gap discrimination

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous research on the interplay between static manual postures and<br />visual attention revealed enhanced visual selection near the hands<br />(near-hand effect). During active movements there is also superior<br />visual performance when moving toward compared to away from the stimulus<br />(direction effect). The ``modulated visual pathways{''} hypothesis<br />argues that differential involvement of magno- and parvocellular visual<br />processing streams causes the near-hand effect. The key finding<br />supporting this hypothesis is an increase in temporal and a reduction in<br />spatial processing in near-hand space (Gozli et al., 2012). Since this<br />hypothesis has, so far, only been tested with static hand postures, we<br />provide a conceptual replication of Gozli et al.'s (2012) result with<br />moving hands, thus also probing the generality of the direction effect.<br />Participants performed temporal or spatial gap discriminations while<br />their right hand was moving below the display. In contrast to Gozli et<br />al (2012), temporal gap discrimination was superior at intermediate and<br />not near hand proximity. In spatial gap discrimination, a direction<br />effect without hand proximity effect suggests that pragmatic attentional<br />maps overshadowed temporal/spatial processing biases for far/near-hand<br />space.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wiemers, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Effects of hand proximity and movement direction in spatial and temporal gap discrimination. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01930

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free