Organizational (Non-) Adoption of Legally Obliged Energy-Saving Technologies: Why (Not) Comply?

1Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although there are organizations that have adopted legally imposed measures regarding energy-saving technologies, up until now, there has been a lot of unused energy-saving potential. Based on existing theories, such as the adoption theory and the institutional theory, this exploratory research investigates the reasons for firms to (or not to) adopt energy-saving technologies, even though they are legally obligated, and it has a positive impact on economic organizational performance. A “multiple mini-case” study, with six cases in the Dutch metalworking/electrical engineering sector and in the synthetic material/rubber sector, were conducted. Results show that, nowadays, organizations do not feel any regulatory pressures as they are not aware of the existence of the concerned legal obligations, e.g., where an organization’s self-awareness (of the relative advantages of the technologies) begins to play the most important role. To adopt the technologies, decisionmakers must be convinced that adopting energy-saving technologies involves advantages for the organization and that the payback time is sufficient. Financial dilemmas negatively influence these adoption processes. Lastly, the continuous intentions of organizations to adopt energy-saving technologies appear to be positively related to the number of adopted technologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Helmond, C. G. C., & Kok, R. A. W. (2022). Organizational (Non-) Adoption of Legally Obliged Energy-Saving Technologies: Why (Not) Comply? Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free