Careflow: Theory and practice

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this presentation we shall review different ways of describing the processes of delivering patient care, and relate these to traditional workflow in business processes, and the concept of "careflow" proposed by Panzarasa and her colleagues in Pavia. We shall discuss the problem of designing a careflow application as a form of process modelling, to be contrasted with older paradigms ranging from rule-based alerts and reminders to Petri nets and Critical path analysis. We shall also consider the need for specialised formalisms for describing clinical processes, drawing on experience with workflow languages (e.g. BPEL4WS, BPMN), guideline modelling languages (e.g. GLIF, PROforma), AI planning languages (e.g. PDDL, OCL) and "agent" programming systems (e.g. LALO, 3APL). The adoption of clinical workflow technology will greatly benefit from the availability of appropriate languages for declaratively representing processes of care. To explore some of the requirements for a clinical workflow technology we will review and critique the PROforma process modelling language and the Arezzo® and Tallis toolsets which use it. The discussion will be illustrated with deployed applications and operational prototypes. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, J., & Dunlop, R. (2008). Careflow: Theory and practice. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4928 LNCS, p. 321). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78238-4_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free