Vitalism has spent most of the twentieth century, and part of the twenty-first, being perhaps the most misunderstood and reviled philosophy of life, with organicism being a close second (on the latter see (Martindale 2013), although some theorists seek to drive a wedge between the two in favor of a ‘reasonable’, less ‘metaphysical’ position often associated with organicism (Gilbert and Sarkar 2000). As a number of the essays in this collection point out (see especially the contributions by Donohue and Moir) vitalism has been conjoined to fascism and the Nazi horrors, and has been reduced to a series of ahistorical propositions. As both Moir and Donohue emphasize, such associations require more study, but at the same time are fundamentally misleading. Nonetheless, the traditional association of vitalism and fascism as well as vitalism and pseudoscience (or anti-science, as Shmidt underscores) has been remarkably pervasive, and still operates.
CITATION STYLE
Donohue, C., & Wolfe, C. T. (2023). Introduction: Vitalism and Its Legacies in Twentieth Century Life Sciences and Philosophy. In History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences (Vol. 29, pp. 1–7). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12604-8_1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.