Towards the automated visualization and analysis of signed language motion - Method and linguistic issues

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a semi-automatic method for the visualization and analysis of motion in signed language from a digital video. The method detects the different parts of the signer's bare skin on the video, tracks the motion of the different parts of the body and represents the frame-wise motion of the parts of the body with statistical descriptors. Results of an experiment are demonstrated and discussed. The main linguistic issue deals with the relationship between signs and transitional sequences. Evidence is provided for the claim that lexical-phonological and transitional sequences are qualitatively different in terms of their motion characteristics.

References Powered by Scopus

Prosody in Israeli sign language

191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German sign language

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Electronic Lexicography

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prosodic correlates of sentences in signed languages: A literature review and suggestions for new types of studies

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Signs and transitions: Do they differ phonetically and does it matter?

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jantunen, T., Koskela, M., Laaksonen, J., & Rainò, P. (2010). Towards the automated visualization and analysis of signed language motion - Method and linguistic issues. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody. International Speech Communication Association. https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2010-103

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 7

78%

Computer Science 2

22%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free