The Ethics of Diagnosis

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A major focus of the philosophy of medicine and, in general, of the philosophy of science has been the interplay of facts and values. Nowhere is an evaluation of this interplay more important than in the ethics of diagnosis. Traditionally, diagnosis has been understood as an epistemological activity which is concerned with facts and excludes the intrusion of values. The essays in this volume challenge this assumption. Questions of knowledge in diagnosis are intimately related to the concerns with intervention that characterize the applied science of medicine. Broad social and individual goals, as well as diverse ethical frameworks, are shown to condition both the processes and results of diagnosis. This has significant implications for bioethics, implications that have not previously been developed. With this volume, `the ethics of diagnosis' is established as an important branch of bioethics. Section 1. Historical perspectives -- section 2. Anthropological interpretations -- section 3. The socio-cultural dimension of medical knowledge -- section 4. Computer augmented diagnosis -- section 5. The ethics of diagnosis in the post-modern world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

The Ethics of Diagnosis. (1992). The Ethics of Diagnosis. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-28333-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free