While contractual rights are usually assignable, the extent to which contractual obligations may be "assigned" or otherwise "transferred" is unclear. In this article, Justine Kirby examines the common law, section 11 of the Contractual Remedies Act 1979, and accepted methods of "transferring" obligations, and then compares the effects of a purported assignment of obligations under New Zealand, English and United States law. She argues that the law should be clarified, and offers drafting suggestions to lawyers to give effect to parties' intentions while the law remains uncertain.
CITATION STYLE
Kirby, J. (2000). Assignments and Transfers of Contractual Duties: Integrating Theory and Practice. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 31(2), 317–354. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v31i2.5956
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.