Evo-devo as a Trading Zone

16Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evo-Devo exhibits a plurality of scientific “cultures” of practice and theory. When do these cultures act—individually or collectively—in ways that actually move research forward, empirically, theoretically, and ethically? When do they become imperialistic, in the sense of excluding and subordinating other cultures? This chapter identifies six cultures—three styles (mathematical modeling, mechanism, and history) and three paradigms (adaptationism, structuralism, and cladism). The key assumptions standing behind, under, and within each of these cultures are explored. Characterizing the internal structure of each is necessary for understanding how they collaborate or compete, and how they are fragmented or integrated, in the rich interdisciplinary trading zone (Galison 1997) of Evo-Devo. Evo-Devo is an important example of how science can progress through a radical plurality of perspectives and cultures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winther, R. G. (2015). Evo-devo as a Trading Zone. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 307, pp. 459–482). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free