Do trade agreements substantially limit development of local / sustainable food systems in Canada?

  • MacRae R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A common view in policy and business circles is that certain elements of trade agreements (General Agreement on Tariff and Trade rules, the World Trade Organization Agreement on Agriculture, and the North American Free Trade Agreement) and the Canadian Agreement on Internal Trade significantly limit the policy and program instruments available to support the development of local/sustainable food systems.  This exploratory textual analysis of select trade articles, filtered through a local/sustainable lens, suggests that Canadian governments can put in place more substantial policy and program drivers without triggering trade disputes.  Of particular note is that local/sustainable foods may not be considered equivalent to imported conventional ones, and therefore many provisions of the trade agreements may not be applicable.  Equally important, the rules do permit certain kinds of support, there are numerous exemptions and thresholds for application of measures, and many current actors in local/sustainable implementation may not be subject to the agreements. Based on this textual analysis, pertinent instrument design features are proposed that would allow governments and other parties to support local/sustainable food systems without triggering trade disputes.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MacRae, R. (2014). Do trade agreements substantially limit development of local / sustainable food systems in Canada? Canadian Food Studies / La Revue Canadienne Des Études Sur l’alimentation, 1(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.15353/cfs-rcea.v1i1.25

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

27%

Environmental Science 2

18%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0