In vitro detection of circulating tumor cells compared by the CytoTrack and CellSearch methods

42Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Comparison of two methods to detect circulating tumor cells (CTC) CytoTrack and CellSearch through recovery of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, spiked into blood collected from healthy donors. Spiking of a fixed number of EpCAM and pan-cytokeratin positive MCF-7 cells into 7.5 mL donor blood was performed by FACSAria flow sorting. The samples were shipped to either CytoTrack or CellSearch research facilities within 48 h, where evaluation of MCF-7 recovery was performed. CytoTrack and CellSearch analyses were performed simultaneously. Recoveries of MCF-7 single cells, cells in clusters, and clusters were determined. The average numbers of MCF-7 cells/cells in clusters/clusters recovered from blood by the CytoTrack and CellSearch methods were 103 ± 5.9/27 ± 7.9/11 ± 3.5 (95 % CI) and 107 ± 4.4/20 ± 7.1/10 ± 3.5, respectively, with no difference between the two methods (p = 0.37/p = 0.23/p = 0.09). Overall, the recovery of CytoTrack and CellSearch was 68.8 ± 3.9 %/71.1 ± 2.9 %, respectively (p = 0.58). In spite of different methodologies, CytoTrack and CellSearch found similar number of CTCs, when spiking was performed with the EpCAM and pan cytokeratin-positive cell line MCF-7. The results suggest that CytoTrack and CellSearch have similar abilities to identify CTC in vitro.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hillig, T., Horn, P., Nygaard, A. B., Haugaard, A. S., Nejlund, S., Brandslund, I., & Sölétormos, G. (2015). In vitro detection of circulating tumor cells compared by the CytoTrack and CellSearch methods. Tumor Biology, 36(6), 4597–4601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3105-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free