Diagnosis-specific sickness absence as a predictor of mortality: The Whitehall II prospective cohort study

112Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether knowing the diagnosis for sickness absence improves prediction of mortality. Design: Prospective cohort study established in 1985-8. Sickness absence records including diagnoses were obtained from computerised registers. Setting: 20 civil service departments in London. Participants 6478 civil servants aged 35-55 years. Main outcome measures: All cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality until 2004, average follow-up 13 years. Results: After adjustment for age, sex, and employment grade, employees who had one or more medically certified spells of sickness absence (>7 days) in a three year period had a mortality 1.7 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.1) times greater than those with no medically certified spells. Inclusion of diagnoses improved the prediction of all cause mortality (P=0.03). The hazard ratio for mortality was 4.7 (2.6 to 8.5) for absences with circulatory disease diagnoses, 2.2 (1.4 to 3.3) for surgical operations, and 1.9 (1.2 to 3.1) for psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiatric absences were also predictive of cancer mortality (2.5 (1.3 to 4.7)). Associations of infectious, respiratory, and injury absences with overall mortality were less marked (hazard ratios from 1.5 to 1.7), and there was no association between musculoskeletal absences and mortality. Conclusions: Major diagnoses for medically certified absences were associated with increased mortality, with the exception of musculoskeletal disease. Data on sickness absence diagnoses may provide useful information to identify groups with increased health risk and a need for targeted interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Head, J., Ferrie, J. E., Alexanderson, K., Westerlund, H., Vahtera, J., & Kivimäki, M. (2008). Diagnosis-specific sickness absence as a predictor of mortality: The Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ, 337(7674), 855–858. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1469

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free