Variance Estimation With Complex Data and Finite Population Correction—A Paradigm for Comparing Jackknife and Formula-Based Methods for Variance Estimation

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The finite population correction (FPC) factor is often used to adjust variance estimators for survey data sampled from a finite population without replacement. As a replicated resampling approach, the jackknife approach is usually implemented without the FPC factor incorporated in its variance estimates. A paradigm is proposed to compare the jackknifed variance estimates with those yielded by the delta method because the delta method has the effect of the FPC factor implicitly integrated. The goal is to examine whether the grouped jackknife approach properly estimates the variance of complex samples without incorporating the FPC effect, in particular for data sampled from a finite population with a high sampling rate. The investigation focuses on the data drawn by two-stage sampling with probability proportional to size of schools and with simple random sampling of students. Moreover, the Hájek approximation of the joint probabilities is used in the delta method for a Horvitz–Thompson (H–T) estimator. Samples of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) state science assessments are used in the analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qian, J. (2020). Variance Estimation With Complex Data and Finite Population Correction—A Paradigm for Comparing Jackknife and Formula-Based Methods for Variance Estimation. ETS Research Report Series, 2020(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free