(Non-)Belief in Things: Affect Theory and a New Literary Materialism

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter argues that contemporary literary criticism suffers from a reflexive faith in things, conceived broadly as static objects that reflect wider political, social, and cultural practices. Literature is re-imagined here as an open-ended event that demands an immanent materialism in which distinctions between literary objects and human bodies no longer stand up. By reflecting on the ambiguous “thingness” of Shakespeare, Vallelly draws attention to the elusive nature of things in theatrical spaces, and explores how this enigmatic materiality can be applied to literary experience more generally. To do so, he draws on Roberto’s Bolaño’s 2666, affect theory, and new materialism to construct a new literary materialism, one in which literary meaning is located neither in the human nor in the non-human world, but in the affective correspondence between these worlds. To illustrate this point, the chapter concludes with a discussion of the relationship between characters and stones in Shakespearean drama.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vallelly, N. (2019). (Non-)Belief in Things: Affect Theory and a New Literary Materialism. In Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism (pp. 45–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97268-8_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free