Participant Anonymity in the Internet Age: From Theory to Practice

34Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Qualitative researchers attempting to protect the identities of their research participants now face a multitude of new challenges due to the wealth of information once considered private but now readily accessible online. We will draw on our research with family members of people with severe brain injury to discuss these challenges in relation to three areas: participant engagement with the mass media, the availability of court transcripts online, and participants’ use of social media. We suggest strategies for managing these challenges via disguise, refining informed consent, and discussion with interviewees. In the context of a largely theoretical literature on anonymization, this article offers concrete examples of the dilemmas we faced and will be of illustrative use to other researchers confronting similar challenges.

References Powered by Scopus

886Citations
1511Readers
Get full text
377Citations
1653Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Participant Anonymity in the Internet Age: From Theory to Practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948697

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

72%

Researcher 15

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 44

50%

Psychology 24

27%

Business, Management and Accounting 13

15%

Computer Science 7

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0