Budget-balanced and nearly efficient randomized mechanisms: Public goods and beyond

15Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many scenarios where participants hold private information require payments to encourage truthful revelation. Some of these scenarios have no natural residual claimant who would absorb the budget surplus or cover the deficit. Faltings [7] proposed the idea of excluding one agent uniformly at random and making him the residual claimant. Based on this idea, we propose two classes of public good mechanisms and derive optimal ones within each class: Faltings' mechanism is optimal in one of the classes. We then move on to general mechanism design settings, where we prove guarantees on the social welfare achieved by Faltings' mechanism. Finally, we analyze a modification of the mechanism where budget balance is achieved without designating any agent as the residual claimant. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, M., Naroditskiy, V., Conitzer, V., Greenwald, A., & Jennings, N. R. (2011). Budget-balanced and nearly efficient randomized mechanisms: Public goods and beyond. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7090 LNCS, pp. 158–169). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25510-6_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free