Strategy and business history rejoined: How and why strategic management concepts took over business history

6Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Scholars at the intersection of business history and strategic management have argued for the relevance and importance of historical methods in the study of strategic management of organizations. We flip this argument and ask about the role of strategic management concepts in the study of business history. We analyze volumes of Business History and Business History Review and a representative sample of business history books using a comprehensive set of keywords, each related to a specific sub-discourse in strategic management. Our results show that as scientific communities, business history and strategic management have become increasingly similar in their conceptual overlap. This study contributes further nuance to the understanding of intellectual change across scientific communities, and the role of business history in the rise of management and organizational history.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lamberg, J. A., Ojala, J., & Gustafsson, J. P. (2022). Strategy and business history rejoined: How and why strategic management concepts took over business history. Business History, 64(6), 1011–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2020.1856076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free