Towards a pain-free venepuncture

35Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A randomised, prospective trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of various means of alleviating the pain of subcutaneous lidocaine infiltration. One hundred and twenty-two patients were randomly allocated to different groups to receive buffered lidocaine 1%, warmed lidocaine 1% or infiltration by the counter-irritation technique. A visual analogue pain score was recorded at different stages of cannulation and results showed that pain scores were significantly lower in the group receiving buffered lidocaine 1% (p < 0.02) and in the counter-irritation group (p < 0.05). Thus buffering lidocaine 1% and administration of lidocaine 1% by the counter-irritation technique is effective in relieving the pain of lidocaine infiltration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ong, E. L., Lim, N. L., & Koay, C. K. (2000). Towards a pain-free venepuncture. Anaesthesia, 55(3), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01124.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free