Human–Wildlife Interaction—A Social Survey

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the results of a survey presented in this paper, we provide insight into public attitudes towards dealing with wildlife. Based on 1569 data sets derived from participating stakeholders, we inquired about the individual experience the participants had made with wild animals, and asked about their personal engagement, attitude towards management, and emotions involved and tried to evaluate basic contextual knowledge. As a result, we discovered a positive effect showing that a strong opinion about dealing with wildlife is associated with increasing contextual knowledge. People that are experienced in and engaged in wildlife conservation expressed significantly stronger positive emotions in this context. We conclude that education is essential in dealing with wildlife responsibly and that positive emotions are a main trigger for such engagement. The results of the survey underline that a combination of contextual knowledge and a positive attitude towards wildlife leads to a higher awareness of possible conflicts between humans and wildlife. Furthermore, these criteria are crucial when developing strategies that strive for a sustainable coexistence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grundei, L. L., Schöttes, F. M., Gethöffer, F., Tost, D., Kluge, L., Siebert, U., & Pees, M. (2024). Human–Wildlife Interaction—A Social Survey. Animals, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050808

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free