Addressing Undergraduate Student Misconceptions about Natural Selection with an Interactive Simulated Laboratory

42Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although evolutionary theory is considered to be a unifying foundation for biological education, misconceptions about basic evolutionary processes such as natural selection inhibit student understanding. Even after instruction, students harbor misconceptions about natural selection, suggesting that traditional teaching methods are insufficient for correcting these confusions. This has spurred an effort to develop new teaching methods and tools that effectively confront student misconceptions. In this study, we designed an interactive computer-based simulated laboratory to teach the principles of evolution through natural selection and to correct common student misconceptions about this process. We quantified undergraduate student misconceptions and understanding of natural selection before and after instruction with multiple-choice and open-response test questions and compared student performance across gender and academic levels. While our lab appeared to be effective at dispelling some common misconceptions about natural selection, we did not find evidence that it was as successful at increasing student mastery of the major principles of natural selection. Student performance varied across student academic level and question type, but students performed equally across gender. Beginner students were more likely to use misconceptions before instruction. Advanced students showed greater improvement than beginners on multiple-choice questions, while beginner students reduced their use of misconceptions in the open-response questions to a greater extent. These results suggest that misconceptions can be effectively addressed through computer-based simulated laboratories. Given the level of misconception use by beginner and advanced undergraduates and the gains in performance recorded after instruction at both academic levels, natural selection should continue to be reviewed through upper-level biology courses.

References Powered by Scopus

Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution

544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners

529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection

392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Biology undergraduates' misconceptions about genetic drift

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Moving evolution education forward: A systematic analysis of literature to identify gaps in collective knowledge for teaching

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Short lesson plan associated with increased acceptance of evolutionary theory and potential change in three alternate conceptions of macroevolution in undergraduate students

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abraham, J. K., Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., Maruca, S., & Stal, D. (2008). Addressing Undergraduate Student Misconceptions about Natural Selection with an Interactive Simulated Laboratory. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0142-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

61%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

16%

Researcher 12

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33

49%

Social Sciences 23

34%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

10%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free