The Obesity Paradox: A Misleading Term That Should Be Abandoned

37Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The term “obesity paradox” is a figure of speech, not a scientific term. The term has no precise definition and has been used to describe numerous observations that have little in common other than the finding of an association of obesity with a favorable outcome. The terminology has led to misunderstandings among researchers and the public alike. It's time for authors and editors to abandon the use of this term. Simply labeling counterintuitive findings as the “obesity paradox” adds no value. Unexpected findings should not be viewed negatively; such findings can lead to new knowledge, better treatments, and scientific advances.

References Powered by Scopus

Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes

2276Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Weight loss is a reversible factor in the prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

930Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gluteofemoral body fat as a determinant of metabolic health

628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Obesity or BMI Paradox? Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The evolution of body composition in oncology— epidemiology, clinical trials, and the future of patient care: Facts and numbers

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adiposity and Outcome After Ischemic Stroke: Obesity Paradox for Mortality and Obesity Parabola for Favorable Functional Outcomes

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flegal, K. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). The Obesity Paradox: A Misleading Term That Should Be Abandoned. Obesity, 26(4), 629–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22140

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

53%

Researcher 8

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

36%

Sports and Recreations 11

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

19%

Social Sciences 5

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0