Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting-how can we do better?

31Citations
Citations of this article
139Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although national systems for reporting ADRs exist there is a low reporting rate. The aim of the current study was to evaluate an intervention plan for improving ADRs reporting among medical professionals (physicians and nurses). A multicentre intervention study was conducted, in which one medical centre was randomly assigned to the intervention group and two medical centres to the control group. The study consisted of 3 phases: baseline data collection, intervention and follow-up of the reporting rate. The questionnaire that was filled in at base line and at the end of study, contained questions about personal/professional demographic variables, and statements regarding knowledge of and behaviour toward ADRs reporting. The intervention program consisted of posters, lectures, distant electronic learning and reminders. An increase in the number of ADRs reports was noted in the intervention group (74 times higher than in the control group) during the intervention period, which was gradually decreased with as the study progressed (adjusted O.R = 74.1, 95% CI = 21.11-260.1, p<0.001). The changes in the "knowledge related to behaviour"(p = 0.01) and in the "behaviour related to reporting"(p<0.001) score was significantly higher in the intervention group. Specialist physicians and nurses (p<0.001), fulfilling additional positions (p<0.001) and those working in other places (p = 0.05) demonstrated a high rate of report. Lectures were preferable as a method to encourage ADRs reporting. The most convenient reporting tools were telephone and online reporting. Thus, implementation and maintenance of a continuous intervention program, by a pharmacovigilance specialist staff member, will improve ADRs reporting rates.

References Powered by Scopus

A theory of human motivation

13339Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A meta- analysis of prospective studies

4385Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adverse drug reactions: Definitions, diagnosis, and management

2313Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors Associated with Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review Update

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying adverse drug reactions from free-text electronic hospital health record notes

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shchory, M. P., Goldstein, L. H., Arcavi, L., Shihmanter, R., Berkovitch, M., & Levy, A. (2020). Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting-how can we do better? PLoS ONE, 15(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235591

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

64%

Researcher 9

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 20

42%

Nursing and Health Professions 17

35%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

19%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0