Identifying Hate Speech Trends and Prevention in Indonesia: a Cross-Case Comparison

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article provides an analysis on Indonesia’s hate speech phenomenon within the past two decades. It identifies shared characteristics across hate speech campaigns and how state and non-state actors have addressed them. In doing so, the article compares three campaigns targeting: the Ahmadiyya (2005–2011), Shi’a (2006–2012) and Jakarta’s Chinese Christian Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (2016–2017). It finds that despite their unique dynamics, each campaign shared several commonalities. They were enabled by rising religious conservatism, sustained support from politicians, and competition for socio-economic capital; their framing strategy similarly used a threat-to-survival narrative, leveraged state regulations, and involved amplifying their voices through online spaces; and they had similar long-term impact which, despite an absence of mass violence, normalised the deprivation of vulnerable minorities’ fundamental rights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alexandra, L. A., & Satria, A. (2023). Identifying Hate Speech Trends and Prevention in Indonesia: a Cross-Case Comparison. Global Responsibility to Protect, 15(2–3), 135–176. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-20230005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free