Slips of action and sequential decisions: A cross-validation study of tasks assessing habitual and goal-directed action control

37Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Instrumental learning and decision-making rely on two parallel systems: a goal-directed and a habitual system. In the past decade, several paradigms have been developed to study these systems in animals and humans by means of e.g., overtraining, devaluation procedures and sequential decision-making. These different paradigms are thought to measure the same constructs, but cross-validation has rarely been investigated. In this study we compared two widely used paradigms that assess aspects of goal-directed and habitual behavior. We correlated parameters from a two-step sequential decision-making task that assesses model-based (MB) and model-free (MF) learning with a slips-of-action paradigm that assesses the ability to suppress cue-triggered, learnt responses when the outcome has been devalued and is therefore no longer desirable. MB control during the two-step task showed a very moderately positive correlation with goal-directed devaluation sensitivity, whereas MF control did not show any associations. Interestingly, parameter estimates of MB and goal-directed behavior in the two tasks were positively correlated with higher-order cognitive measures (e.g., visual short-term memory). These cognitive measures seemed to (at least partly) mediate the association between MB control during sequential decision-making and goal-directed behavior after instructed devaluation. This study provides moderate support for a common framework to describe the propensity towards goal-directed behavior as measured with two frequently used tasks. However, we have to caution that the amount of shared variance between the goal-directed and MB system in both tasks was rather low, suggesting that each task does also pick up distinct aspects of goal-directed behavior. Further investigation of the commonalitiesanddifferencesbetweentheMFandhabitsystemsasmeasured with these,andother,tasksisneeded.Also,afollow-upcross-validationonthe neural systemsdrivingtheseconstructsacrossdifferentparadigmswouldpromote the definitionandoperationalizationofmeasuresofinstrumentallearninganddecision-making inhumans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sjoerds, Z., Dietrich, A., Deserno, L., de Wit, S., Villringer, A., Heinze, H. J., … Horstmann, A. (2016). Slips of action and sequential decisions: A cross-validation study of tasks assessing habitual and goal-directed action control. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free