Triage vital signs predict in-hospital mortality among emergency department patients with acute poisoning: A case control study

20Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To document the relationship between triage vital signs and in-hospital mortality among emergency department (ED) patients with acute poisoning. Methods. Poisoning patients who admitted to our emergency department during the study period were enrolled. Patients demographic data were collected and odds ratios (OR) of triage vital signs to in-hospital mortality were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the proper cut-off value of vital signs that predict in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the association of in-hospital mortality and vital signs after adjusting for different variables. Results: 997 acute poisoning patients were enrolled, with 70 fatal cases (6.7%). A J-shaped relationship was found between triage vital signs and in-hospital mortality. ED triage vital signs exceed cut-off values independently predict in-hospital mortality after adjusting for variables were as follow: body temperature <36 or >37°C, p<0.01, OR=2.8; systolic blood pressure <100 or >150mmHg, p<0.01, OR: 2.5; heart rate <35 or >120bpm, p<0.01, OR: 3.1; respiratory rate <16 or >20 per minute, p=0.38, OR: 1.4. Conclusions: Triage vital signs could predict in-hospital mortality among ED patients with acute poisoning. A J-curve relationship was found between triage vital signs and in-hospital mortality. ED physicians should take note of the extreme initial vital signs in these patients. © 2012 Yu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, J. H., Weng, Y. M., Chen, K. F., Chen, S. Y., & Lin, C. C. (2012). Triage vital signs predict in-hospital mortality among emergency department patients with acute poisoning: A case control study. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-262

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free