Governance and upgrading in GVCs: Why does embeddedness matter

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose – This study’s primary objective is to propose actors’ embeddedness as a source for governance and upgrading within the GVC (Global Value Chain) framework. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses co-word analysis to study the GVC scientific production. The analysis is conducted using controversies mapping from the Theory of Scientific and Technological Change (TSTC). Findings – Two theoretical gaps were identified. First, governance and upgrading have more than one definition. Second, value and network are upgrading strategies. This article proposes the use of the Montenegro and Bulgacov (2014) framework to translate governance and upgrading respectively as network governance and strategic outcomes. Embeddedness matters because it is a stable theoretical concept (Granovetter, 1985) that can be a link between network governance and strategic results. Originality/value – The study’s main contribution is to propose relativist embeddedness as a source of governance and upgrading. The second contribution is to present an ANT-based framework to study governance and its strategic results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortes, P. J. de O. C., Stettiner, C. F., & Okano, M. T. (2019). Governance and upgrading in GVCs: Why does embeddedness matter. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 21(4), 740–759. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i4.4015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free