Integrating Problem-based Learning with Community-engaged Learning in Teaching Program Development and Implementation

  • Hou S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Problem-based learning (PBL) challenges students to learn and work in groups to seek solutions to real world problems. Connecting academic study with community-engaged learning (CEL) experience can deeper learning and thinking. This paper highlights the integration of PBL with CEL in the Implementation Course to engage graduate students in designing theory-based health promotion programs for communities. Methods: Real world scenarios were used in student-led and faculty-facilitated group discussions and projects. The end-of-class reflections and comments from students enrolled in the Implementation Course during 2005-2013 were analyzed (total n = 162). Inductive, descriptive analyses via an iterative process were conducted to identify themes and patterns. Results: Overall the Implementation Course received high evaluation (16-items), ranging from "very good" to "superior" (mean of 4.78 on a 5-point scale). Students commented that (1) the nurturing PBL sessions facilitated critical thinking; (2) the life-changing CEL resulted self-confidence and self-awareness; and (3) the integrated PBL with CEL course design increased relevance. Our community partners also expressed deep appreciation towards the quality work students delivered. Conclusion: The innovations in education provided valuable learning structure for students in higher education and produced theory- and evidence-based intervention plans and material products addressing community-identified health needs.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hou, S.-I. (2014). Integrating Problem-based Learning with Community-engaged Learning in Teaching Program Development and Implementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020101

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

19%

Researcher 6

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 22

58%

Psychology 7

18%

Computer Science 5

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0