Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: Monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66

29Citations
Citations of this article
183Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this Guide is to provide both logical and empirical evidence for medical teachers to improve their objective tests by appropriate interpretation of post-examination analysis. This requires a description and explanation of some basic statistical and psychometric concepts derived from both Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) such as: descriptive statistics, explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis, Generalisability Theory and Rasch modelling. CTT is concerned with the overall reliability of a test whereas IRT can be used to identify the behaviour of individual test items and how they interact with individual student abilities. We have provided the reader with practical examples clarifying the use of these frameworks in test development and for research purposes. © 2012 Informa UK Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Making sense of Cronbach's alpha

8307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factor Analysis in the Development and Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments

2922Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

1290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part II: Organisation & Administration

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE Guide No 90: Part II

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychometric evaluation of a knowledge based examination using Rasch analysis: An illustrative guide: AMEE Guide No. 72

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2012). Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: Monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66. Medical Teacher, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.651178

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

48%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 24

21%

Researcher 13

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 94

82%

Social Sciences 15

13%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

3%

Psychology 3

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free