Blockchain for Electronic Vaccine Certificates: More Cons Than Pros?

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Electronic vaccine certificates (EVC) for COVID-19 vaccination are likely to become widespread. Blockchain (BC) is an electronic immutable distributed ledger and is one of the more common proposed EVC platform options. However, the principles of blockchain are not widely understood by public health and medical professionals. We attempt to describe, in an accessible style, how BC works and the potential benefits and drawbacks in its use for EVCs. Our assessment is BC technology is not well suited to be used for EVCs. Overall, blockchain technology is based on two key principles: the use of cryptography, and a distributed immutable ledger in the format of blockchains. While the use of cryptography can provide ease of sharing vaccination records while maintaining privacy, EVCs require some amount of contribution from a centralized authority to confirm vaccine status; this is partly because these authorities are responsible for the distribution and often the administration of the vaccine. Having the data distributed makes the role of a centralized authority less effective. We concluded there are alternative ways to use cryptography outside of a BC that allow a centralized authority to better participate, which seems necessary for an EVC platform to be of practical use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toubiana, R., Macdonald, M., Rajananda, S., Lokvenec, T., Kingsley, T. C., & Romero-Brufau, S. (2022, July 8). Blockchain for Electronic Vaccine Certificates: More Cons Than Pros? Frontiers in Big Data. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.833196

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free