Dust and Debitage: An Archaeology of Francis Bacon’s Studio

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This short chapter offers a personal reflection based on the author’s involvement in the reconstruction phase of the Francis Bacon studio project. During this project, archaeologists were employed to deconstruct or ‘excavate’ the contents of Francis Bacon’s painting studio in London, and meticulously reconstruct the room at Dublin City Gallery The Hugh Lane. The studio had long been renowned for its wondrously chaotic contents, its floor strewn with the debris of his creative practice, and its walls—which played the role of an artist’s pallet—embellished with vibrant pigments. This chapter draws on ‘rubbish theory’ relating to the aesthetics of industrial ruins exemplified in the work of Tim Edensor. This research provides a way of exploring why Bacon may have found working in the archaeological equivalent of a ‘midden’ both an efficacious and enjoyable process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Connor, B. (2014). Dust and Debitage: An Archaeology of Francis Bacon’s Studio. In One World Archaeology (Vol. 11, pp. 131–139). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8990-0_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free