Naturalism, Historism, and Phenomenology

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to a generally accepted thesis, science and metaphysics are separate intellectual activities. The thesis is new and not generally accepted in the philosophical systems of Classical Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the first centuries in the development of the modern philosophy. The thesis presupposes the existence of sciences and their methodologies. Natural sciences in the modern sense exist since the sixteenth century, human sciences since the first half of the nineteenth century, and formal sciences since the end of the nineteenth century. Only the relation between the natural and the human sciences as empirical sciences are of interest for this investigation. Systematic reflections on the methodologies of the natural sciences emerge in the first half of the nineteenth and of the human and the formal sciences since the second half of the nineteenth century. Before proceeding, two key concepts need preliminary clarification, namely (a) methodology and (b) ontology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seebohm, T. M. (2010). Naturalism, Historism, and Phenomenology. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 62, pp. 7–32). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9286-1_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free