Biased kriging on the sphere?

8Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is well known among geodesists that homogeneous-isotropic processes on the sphere which are both Gaussian and ergodic, do not exist. Thus we have to give up one of the two properties as soon as we consider global phenomena such as the (residual) topography, the disturbing gravity field, etc. In case of a non-Gaussian process we are facing problems in deriving the proper distribution functions for our test statistics, beside the fact that such a process is not completely defined by its first two moments. On the other hand, a non-ergodic process does not allow us to equivalently express "expectation' and "covariance' as spatial integral over any of its realizations. Hence our usual methods to derive the covariance function (or the semi-variogram) fail to produce consistent - or even unbiased - estimates. This may turn out to be not as critical as it seems if we only could control the mean square error of the predicted phenomenon. For this purpose we introduce, in a second step, homBLIP (Best homogeneously LInear Prediction) as a biased alternative to Ordinary Kriging with a slightly reduced mean square error, thereby using new types of homeograms. -Author

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaffrin, B. (1993). Biased kriging on the sphere? Geostatistics Troia ’92. Vol. 1, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1739-5_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free