Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon

39Citations
Citations of this article
117Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The large number of species still to be discovered in fungi, together with an exponentially growing number of environmental sequences that cannot be linked to known taxa, has fuelled the idea that it might be necessary to formally name fungi on the basis of sequence data only. Here we object to this idea due to several shortcomings of the approach, ranging from concerns regarding reproducibility and the violation of general scientific principles to ethical issues. We come to the conclusion that sequence-based nomenclature is potentially harmful for mycology as a discipline. Additionally, a classification based on sequences as types is not within reach anytime soon, because there is a lack of consensus regarding common standards due to the fast pace at which sequencing technologies develop.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thines, M., Crous, P. W., Aime, M. C., Aoki, T., Cai, L., Hyde, K. D., … Stadler, M. (2018). Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon. IMA Fungus, 9(1), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.5598/IMAFUNGUS.2018.09.01.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free