Background: In 2002, the World Health Organization published a health system performance ranking for 191 member countries. The ranking was based on five indicators, with fixed weights common to all countries. Methods: We investigate the feasibility and desirability of using mathematical programming techniques that allow weights to vary across countries to reflect their varying circumstances and objectives. Results: By global distributional measures, scores and ranks are found to be not very sensitive to changes in weights, although differences can be large for individual countries. Conclusions: Building the flexibility of variable weights into calculation of the performance index is a useful way to respond to the debates and criticisms appearing since publication of the ranking.
CITATION STYLE
Lauer, J. A., Lovell, C. A. K., Murray, C. J. L., & Evans, D. B. (2004). World health system performance revisited: The impact of varying the relative importance of health system goals. BMC Health Services Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-4-19
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.