Weapons: The growth & spread of the precision-strike regime

26Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For two decades, scholars and practitioners have argued that the world is experiencing a Revolution in Military Affairs brought on by the development and diffusion of precision-strike and related capabilities. The United States took an early lead in exploiting the promise of precision-strike systems, and the use of precision weaponry has given the United States a battlefield edge for twenty years. However, these weapons are now spreading: other countries, and non-state actors, are acquiring them and developing countermeasures against them. As the precision-strike regime matures, the United States will see its edge erode. The ability of the United States to project power will diminish considerably. In addition, U.S. forces, and eventually the United States itself, will be increasingly vulnerable to precision weapons in the hands of our adversaries. © 2011 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences.

References Powered by Scopus

A revolution in warfare

241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The future of military innovation studies

151Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CIA's covert predator drone war in Pakistan, 2004-2010: The history of an assassination campaign

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Technology and the era of the mass army

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The ‘Third’ US Offset Strategy and Europe’s ‘Anti-access’ Challenge

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Competitive Strategies against Continental Powers: The Geopolitics of Sino-Indian-American Relations

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mahnken, T. G. (2011). Weapons: The growth & spread of the precision-strike regime. Daedalus, 140(3), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00097

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

89%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 12

57%

Engineering 4

19%

Arts and Humanities 4

19%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free