Conserved Roles of the Prion Protein Domains on Subcellular Localization and Cell-Cell Adhesion

18Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Analyses of cultured cells and transgenic mice expressing prion protein (PrP) deletion mutants have revealed that some properties of PrP -such as its ability to misfold, aggregate and trigger neurotoxicity- are controlled by discrete molecular determinants within its protein domains. Although the contributions of these determinants to PrP biosynthesis and turnover are relatively well characterized, it is still unclear how they modulate cellular functions of PrP. To address this question, we used two defined activities of PrP as functional readouts: 1) the recruitment of PrP to cell-cell contacts in Drosophila S2 and human MCF-7 epithelial cells, and 2) the induction of PrP embryonic loss- and gain-of-function phenotypes in zebrafish. Our results show that homologous mutations in mouse and zebrafish PrPs similarly affect their subcellular localization patterns as well as their in vitro and in vivo activities. Among PrP's essential features, the N-terminal leader peptide was sufficient to drive targeting of our constructs to cell contact sites, whereas lack of GPI-anchoring and N-glycosylation rendered them inactive by blocking their cell surface expression. Importantly, our data suggest that the ability of PrP to homophilically trans-interact and elicit intracellular signaling is primarily encoded in its globular domain, and modulated by its repetitive domain. Thus, while the latter induces the local accumulation of PrPs at discrete punctae along cell contacts, the former counteracts this effect by promoting the continuous distribution of PrP. In early zebrafish embryos, deletion of either domain significantly impaired PrP's ability to modulate E-cadherin cell adhesion. Altogether, these experiments relate structural features of PrP to its subcellular distribution and in vivo activity. Furthermore, they show that despite their large evolutionary history, the roles of PrP domains and posttranslational modifications are conserved between mouse and zebrafish. © 2013 Solis et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. EGFP-tagged PrP constructs used in this study. The structural domains of zebrafish (zf) PrP-1, PrP-2 and mouse (m) PrP are represented as follows: leader peptide containing the polybasic motif (L) in violet, repetitive domain (Rep) in blue, hydrophobic region (Hyd) in red, globular domain (Glob) in light blue and GPI-anchored signal (GPI) in yellow. Amino acid (aa) positions of mouse and fish PrP domains are indicated. The EGFP fluorescence tags are depicted as green triangles. Deletion constructs lacking Rep (DRep), Hyd (DHyd), Glob (DGlob), Rep+Hyd+Glob (DCore), GPI (GPI2) and N-glycosylation sites (Glyc2) are shown for mouse PrP only. PrP domains were defined by evolutionary criteria [13]. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070327.g001
  • Figure 2. Accumulation of mouse and zebrafish PrPs at newly formed cell contacts in Drosophila S2 cells. A) Expression of the mouse PrP EGFP fusion construct (m PrP) induces cell contact formation and the subsequent accumulation of PrP at contact sites. This is not observed at fortuitous contacts formed by cells expressing a control construct lacking the major PrP domains (m PrP DCore). Cell-cell contacts are indicated by white arrowheads. Scale bars = 5 mm. B-D) Quantification of the number of S2 cell contacts showing accumulation of wild type (WT) and mutant constructs for mouse PrP (B), zebrafish PrP-1 (C) and zebrafish PrP-2 (D). Construct names are inserted in the graphs. Double and triple asterisks [** and ***] indicate statistical significance at p,0.01 and ,0.001, respectively; one-way ANOVA test; error bars indicate SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070327.g002
  • Figure 3. Accumulation of mouse and zebrafish PrP constructs at established MCF-7 cell cell contacts. Wild type (WT) and mutant EGFPtagged constructs of mouse PrP (A) and zebrafish PrP-1 (B) localize differently at E-cadherin-positive cell contact sites (in red). Marked areas on the overlays are enlarged (right) to show detailed views of the contact sites. Cell nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 10 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070327.g003
  • Figure 4. Localization of mouse PrP and zebrafish PrP-1 constructs in early zebrafish embryos. Expression of EGFP-tagged constructs (green) in the deep cells of 6 hpf zebrafish gastrulae. Plasma membranes were double-counterstained using antibodies against pY416-Src and bcatenin (merged in red). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 10 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070327.g004
  • Figure 5. Rescue of PrP-1 knockdown embryos by mutant PrP-1 constructs. PrP-1 morphant embryos were microinjected with mRNAs encoding selected EGFP-tagged PrP-1 constructs, and their rescue activity was evaluated morphologically and molecularly. A) Quantitative differences in rescue activity between untreated (control) or morphant embryos (PrP-1 MO), and embryos expressing WT, DRep, DGlob and Glyc2 PrP-1 constructs. Data are given as the proportion of embryos showing normal-to-mild gastrulation phenotypes at 6 hpf. Three independent experiments were analyzed (average n = 30 embryos). Triple asterisks [***] indicate statistically significant rescues at p,0.001; one-way ANOVA test; error bars represent SEM. B) Confocal images of deep cells from embryos immunostained against E-cadherin. Rescue is indicated by the recovery of Ecadherin cell-surface localization. Scale bar = 10 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070327.g005
  • Figure 6. Overexpression (OE) of mouse and zebrafish PrP constructs in early zebrafish embryos. Embryos were microinjected with mRNAs encoding all mouse and zebrafish EGFP-tagged PrP constructs. A) OE of mouse or zebrafish WT PrPs in early embryos produces a gain-offunction phenotype characterized by asymmetric gastrulation at 6 hpf. B–D) The activities of mouse and zebrafish constructs were evaluated morphologically by quantifying the proportion of 6 hpf embryos exhibiting the OE phenotype (asymmetric gastrulation). Three independent experiments were analyzed (average n = 30 embryos). Triple asterisks [***] indicate statistically significant reduction in activity at p,0.001; one-way ANOVA test; error bars represent SEM. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070327.g006

References Powered by Scopus

Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish

9766Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Normal development and behaviour of mice lacking the neuronal cell-surface PrP protein

1492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Wnt induces LRP6 signalosomes and promotes dishevelled-dependent LRP6 phosphorylation

766Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Engagement of cellular prion protein with the co-chaperone Hsp70/90 organizing protein regulates the proliferation of glioblastoma stem-like cells

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Activation of zebrafish Src family kinases by the prion protein is an amyloid-β-sensitive signal that prevents the endocytosis and degradation of E-cadherin/β-catenin complexes in vivo

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of cow dung and wood biochars and green manure on soil fertility and tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.) performance on a savanna Alfisol

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Solis, G. P., Radon, Y., Sempou, E., Jechow, K., Stuermer, C. A. O., & Málaga-Trillo, E. (2013). Conserved Roles of the Prion Protein Domains on Subcellular Localization and Cell-Cell Adhesion. PLoS ONE, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070327

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

63%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

43%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 11

39%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

11%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0