Which VIVO harvester queries best populate the VIVO database with accurate faculty member publications?

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health encourages its research partners to use VIVO™ software to enhance research investigator collaboration. VIVO provides a dynamic online directory to facilitate professional networking opportunities for investigators who share similar or complementary research interests (VIVO, 2015). VIVO Harvester performs author searches in PubMed™ to populate VIVO profiles with article citations. Harvester only provides 65% of the total number of references (Eldredge et al., 2015), however. This study describes how the VIVO Harvester query design impacts Harvester's ability to populate the VIVO database with the correct citations to investigator publications. This action research project analyzed elements critical to optimizing Harvester's accuracy, thereby informing the development of similar queries for other institutions. Institution-specific knowledge coupled to expert PubMed search skills are essential to optimizing the accuracy of VIVO. This development fosters discovery and enhances translational research capable of benefitting society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eldredge, J., Garbin, E., & Kroth, P. J. (2015). Which VIVO harvester queries best populate the VIVO database with accurate faculty member publications? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free