Alterations in regional cerebral blood flow following brain injury in the rat

150Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Summary: To elucidate the temporal changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) after experimental traumatic brain injury, serial rCBF measurements were made during a 24-h period following fluid-percussion (F-P) traumatic brain injury in the rat. Brain injury of 2.2 atm was induced over the left parietal cortex and serial measurements of rCBF were performed using the radiolabeled microsphere method. rCBF values were obtained prior to injury and at 15 and 30 min and 1, 2, 4. and 24 h postinjury. At 15 min postinjury, there was a profound, wide-spread reduction in rCBF in all brain regions studied (p < 0.05). At 30 min and 1 h postinjury, all brain regions except pons-medulla and cerebellum showed significantly reduced rCBF compared to the preinjury values (p < 0.05). By 2 h postinjury, however, a significant focal reduction of rCBF was observed only in the cerebral tissue surrounding the trauma site (p < 0.05); rCBF in the remaining brain regions had recovered to the preinjury levels. By 4 h postinjury, rCBF had returned to normal in all brain regions studied. This recovery of rCBF was still evident at 24 h postinjury. The present study demonstrates that, following the experimental traumatic brain injury in the rat, (a) an initial global suppression of rCBF occurs up to 1 h postinjury; (b) at the trauma site, a more persistent focal reduction of rCBF occurs; and (c) these alterations in rCBF after trauma dissolve by 4 h postinjury. The result was discussed in the context of the neurological, electroencephalographic, magnetic resonance spectroscopic. and pathological findings observed in our lateral F-P brain injury rat model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamakami, I., & McIntosh, T. K. (1991). Alterations in regional cerebral blood flow following brain injury in the rat. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 11(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1991.117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free