Rationality and collective beliefs

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As well as being accused of being committed to reductionism, methodological individualism has been criticized because it has been considered to be tantamount to a utilitarian theory of action. According to utilitarianism (and specifically according to the most recent version of it, namely the rational choice model), action is always based on instrumental rationality and on the attempt to maximize subjective utility on the basis of expected consequences (see Demeulenaere 1996, 2003; Boudon 2001, p. 42; Oliverio 2007, pp. 27 ff.). Because methodological individualism is confused with utilitarianism, it has been criticized on the grounds that many actions cannot be explained in utilitarian terms, and that utilitarianism is unable to decipher a great number of relevant social phenomena. However, the equivalence between methodological individualism and utilitarianism does not hold. While it is true that some methodological individualists endorse a utilitarian theory of action (e.g. Becker 1976), other advocates of this approach, such as Hayek, do not. The individualist tradition is informed by a wealth of perspectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Di Iorio, F. (2015). Rationality and collective beliefs. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 22, pp. 121–147). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19512-4_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free