Discovering implicit discourse relations through Brown cluster pair representation and coreference patterns

106Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sentences form coherent relations in a discourse without discourse connectives more frequently than with connectives. Senses of these implicit discourse relations that hold between a sentence pair, however, are challenging to infer. Here, we employ Brown cluster pairs to represent discourse relation and incorporate coreference patterns to identify senses of implicit discourse relations in naturally occurring text. Our system improves the baseline performance by as much as 25%. Feature analyses suggest that Brown cluster pairs and coreference patterns can reveal many key linguistic characteristics of each type of discourse relation. © 2014 Association for Computational Linguistics.

References Powered by Scopus

LIBSVM: A Library for support vector machines

28165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization

2535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling

2312Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Shallow convolutional neural network for implicit discourse relation recognition

110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CoNLL 2016 shared task on multilingual shallow discourse parsing

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving the inference of implicit discourse relations via classifying explicit discourse connectives

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rutherford, A. T., & Xue, N. (2014). Discovering implicit discourse relations through Brown cluster pair representation and coreference patterns. In 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2014, EACL 2014 (pp. 645–654). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/e14-1068

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

66%

Researcher 14

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 51

73%

Linguistics 16

23%

Engineering 2

3%

Neuroscience 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0