Short- and long-term prognostic value of postoperative cardiac troponin I concentration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

152Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The value of postoperative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) has been shown to indicate a higher risk of in-hospital death after cardiac surgery. The authors therefore assessed the long-term prognostic value of cTnI in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 202) were included and divided into two groups according to the postoperative value of cTnI ( 24 h; postoperative requirement of inotropic agent; ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmia; postoperative myocardial infarction) were recorded. Survivors were then followed up over a 2-yr period. Data are median and odds ratio (95% confidence interval). Results: Of all patients, 174 (86%) had a low cTnI (4.1 ng/ml; range, 1.1-12.6) and 28 (14%) had a high cTnI (23.8 ng/ml; range, 13.4-174.6). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different (4 vs. 2%), whereas long-term mortality (18 vs. 3%, P = 0.006) and mortality from cardiac cause (18 vs. 1%, P < 0.001) was greater in patients with a high cTnI. A high cTnI was a significant factor predicting death (odds ratio, 7.3 [2.0-27.1]) or death from cardiac causes (odds ratio, 37.4 [4.2-334.4]). Nonfatal cardiac events were also more frequent in the hospital (64 vs. 41%, P = 0.02) and within the 2-yr follow-up period (39% vs. 16%, P = 0.03) in patients with high cTnI. Conclusion: A high postoperative peak of cTnI is associated with increased risk of death, death from cardiac causes, and nonfatal cardiac events within 2 yr after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fellahi, J. L., Gué, X., Richomme, X., Monier, E., Guillou, L., & Riou, B. (2003). Short- and long-term prognostic value of postoperative cardiac troponin I concentration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology, 99(2), 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200308000-00007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free