Comparative Efficacy of iBGStar™ Glucose Meter vs. A Traditional Glucose Meter in Type 1 Diabetes

  • Nicolucci A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Optimal metabolic control and compliance to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) are poor in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), and may require innovative management strategies. These may include the use of telemedicine and smartphone-linked blood glucose self-monitoring systems. To this purpose, a specific glucose meter (iBGStar (TM)) and a dedicated Diabetes Manager Application (DMApp) have been developed. Aim of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of a smartphone-linked versus a traditional self-monitoring system in reducing HbA1c levels and improving compliance to SMBG. Methods/Design: The ``i-NewTrend{''} study is an open-label, randomized (1:1) trial involving 21 diabetes outpatient clinics in Italy. Overall, 178 subjects aged 14-24 years with type 1 diabetes, with any diabetes duration, HbA1c >= 8%, treated with basal-bolus insulin regimen, and with poor compliance with SMBG will be randomized to two different SMBG strategies: Group A will use iBGStar (TM) + DMApp and Group B (control group) will use a traditional meter for SMBG during a 6-month follow-up (experimental phase). Between-group differences on metabolic control, compliance to SMBG, insulin doses, quality of life, risk of hypoglicaemic episodes and number and type of contacts with diabetes clinics will be evaluated. During a 6 month post-trial observational phase, all randomized patients in group A and B will use iBGStar (TM) + DMApp to evaluate the impact of the system on all the outcomes when the system is used under routine clinical practice conditions. Discussion: Results of the trial iNew Trend will assess whether and to what extent this new strategy of SMBG based on the use of iBGStar (TM) + DMApp will improve the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents and young adults poorly controlled and poorly compliant, both in experimental and usual care settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicolucci, A. (2014). Comparative Efficacy of iBGStarTM Glucose Meter vs. A Traditional Glucose Meter in Type 1 Diabetes. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolism, 05(06). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6156.1000382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free