Can evolutionary constraints explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in high-latitude forests?

21Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Contents 1195 I. 1195 II. 1196 III. 1196 IV. 1200 1200 References 1200 SUMMARY: The rarity of symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees in temperate and boreal ('high-latitude') forests is curious. One explanation - the evolutionary constraints hypothesis - posits that high-latitude N-fixing trees are rare because few have evolved. Here, we consider traits necessary for high-latitude N-fixing trees. We then use recent developments in trait evolution to estimate that > 2000 and > 500 species could have evolved from low-latitude N-fixing trees and high-latitude N-fixing herbs, respectively. Evolution of N-fixing from nonfixing trees is an unlikely source of diversity. Dispersal limitation seems unlikely to limit high-latitude N-fixer diversity. The greater number of N-fixing species predicted to evolve than currently inhabit high-latitude forests suggests a greater role for ecological than evolutionary constraints.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Biogeography of nodulated legumes and their nitrogen-fixing symbionts

266Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Substrate stoichiometry determines nitrogen fixation throughout succession in southern Chinese forests

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nutrient acquisition, soil phosphorus partitioning and competition among trees in a lowland tropical rain forest

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menge, D. N. L., & Crews, T. E. (2016, September 1). Can evolutionary constraints explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in high-latitude forests? The New Phytologist. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14080

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

57%

Researcher 8

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19

58%

Environmental Science 7

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

12%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0