Forecast verification: its complexity and dimensionality

112Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A general framework for the problem of absolute verification (AV) is extended to the problem of comparative verification (CV). Absolute verification focuses on the performance of individual forecasting systems (or forecasters), and it is based on the bivariate distributions of forecasts and observations and its two possible factorizations into conditional and marginal distributions. Comparative verification compares the performance of two or more forecasting systems, which may produce forecasts under 1) identical conditions or 2) different conditions. Complexity can be defined in terms of the number of factorizations, the number of basic factors (conditional and marginal distributions) in each factorization, or the total number of basic factors associated with the respective frameworks. Dimensionality is defined as the number of probabilities that must be specified to reconstruct the basic distribution of forecasts and observations. Failure to take account of the complexity and dimensionality of verification problems may lead to an incomplete and inefficient body of verification methodology and, thereby, to erroneous conclusions regarding the absolute and relative quality and/or value of forecasting systems. -from Author

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, A. H. (1991). Forecast verification: its complexity and dimensionality. Monthly Weather Review, 119(7), 1590–1601. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<1590:FVICAD>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free