The Death and the Resurrection of (Psy)critique: The Case of Neuroeducation

15Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A rapidly emerging hegemonic neuro-culture and a booming neural subjectivity signal the entry point for an inquiry into the status of the signifier neuro as a universal passe-partout. The wager of this paper is that the various (mis)appropriations of the neurosciences in the media and in academia itself point to something essential, if not structural, in connection with both the discipline of the neurosciences and the current socio-cultural and ideological climate. Starting from the case of neuroeducation (the application of neuroscience within education), the genealogy of the neurological turn is linked to the history of psychology and its inextricable bond with processes of psychologisation. If the neurological turn risks not merely neglecting the dimension of critique, but also obviating its possibility, then revivifying a psy-critique (understanding the academified modern subject as grounded in the scientific point of view from nowhere) might be necessary in order to understand today’s neural subjectivity and its place within current biopolitics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Vos, J. (2016). The Death and the Resurrection of (Psy)critique: The Case of Neuroeducation. Foundations of Science, 21(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9369-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free