Aging and the time course of inhibition of return in a static environment

19Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Age-related differences on the time course of inhibition of return (IOR), a phenomenon that refers to a slowed response time for targets appearing at a previously attended location, were examined in 30 young and 30 elderly adults. Stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) between peripheral cues and targets were systematically manipulated on a detection task with a double-cue procedure to capture the onset and offset of IOR. Results show that IOR in elderly people developed 50 ms later as compared to young adults, at an approximately 200 ms cue-target interval. The magnitude of IOR for elderly people was also weaker than that for young adults during short SOAs. Similar magnitude and dissipation of IOR at an approximately 3.5 s cue-target interval during long SOAs were observed for both young and elderly people. Possible reasons underlying the age effects on the time course of IOR and the involvement of temporal processing mechanisms are discussed.

References Powered by Scopus

Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View

2935Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inhibition of return

1509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perception and estimation of time.

700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Conscious Brain

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Elements of Cognitive Aging: Meta-Analyses of Age-Related Differences in Processing Speed and Their Consequences

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bao, Y., Zhou, J., & Fu, L. (2004). Aging and the time course of inhibition of return in a static environment. In Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis (Vol. 64, pp. 403–414). https://doi.org/10.55782/ane-2004-1523

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

33%

Researcher 2

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 10

77%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

8%

Sports and Recreations 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free