Is Nickel Chloride really a Non-Genotoxic Carcinogen?

21Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Human beings are exposed to carcinogens through air, water, food and tobacco smoke. Nickel chloride (NiCl2) is a toxic and carcinogenic environmental and occupational pollutant, which was previously classified as a non-genotoxic carcinogen and thought to not directly alter the DNA. Non-genotoxic carcinogens such as NiCl2 are difficult to detect in vitro; hence, a heavy reliance on animal studies exists. NiCl2 has previously been classified as a non-genotoxic carcinogen (NGTC); however, after studying the effect of NiCl2 on many mechanistic end-points, it has become clear that NiCl2 behaves more like a genotoxic carcinogen. The induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after treatment with NiCl2 along with positive micronuclei results from a preliminary 5-day chronic dose micronucleus study further supports that NiCl2 has been misclassified as a NGTC. It is possible that NiCl2 causes indirect DNA damage by the production of ROS and requires a longer, chronic exposure, which is more similar to that of human exposure. The focus of this MiniReview is on research into the molecular mechanisms of nickel-induced carcinogenicity and potential genotoxicity, with a focus on one of the salts of greatest commercial importance, nickel chloride.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stannard, L., Doak, S. H., Doherty, A., & Jenkins, G. J. (2017, September 1). Is Nickel Chloride really a Non-Genotoxic Carcinogen? Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12689

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free