Mandatory reporting of impaired medical practitioners: Protecting patients, supporting practitioners

21Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Taking action to protect patients from impaired colleagues is a long-standing ethical and professional obligation. In 2010, this responsibility was codified in law with the introduction, across Australia, of a new mandatory reporting regimen. While several concerns remain to be addressed, mandatory reporting has the potential not only to reinforce the primacy of patient safety, but also to open internal dialogue about the profession's response to concerns about practitioner health and well-being. Four years after the introduction of the scheme, key challenges include ensuring the reporting threshold is appropriately defined and clearly understood, improving access to evidence-based health programmes for practitioners, and strengthening upstream protections to prevent and minimise impairment at its roots.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bismark, M. M., Morris, J. M., & Clarke, C. (2014). Mandatory reporting of impaired medical practitioners: Protecting patients, supporting practitioners. Internal Medicine Journal, 44(12), 1165–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free