Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions: Findings From a University Cardiology Practice

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Specialty care access is increasingly constrained due to increasing demand for specialty care. Although much attention has been placed on the initial referral decision, much less is known about follow-up visit patterns. We examined the patterns of follow-up visits for new patients to a university-based cardiology practice and identified independent predictors of follow-up visits. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of new patient visits using electronic medical record data. The primary outcome was a follow-up visit. Results: Substantial variation in practice patterns by provider persisted after accounting for patient and disease factors. Most follow-up care was concentrated in a small population of patients. Conclusion: Specialty care follow-up visits may represent a significant opportunity for standardization and quality improvement, and further studies are warranted to understand follow-up visits in specialty care. Implications: Better understanding of between-provider differences could identify ways to reduce unnecessary follow-up visits. Level of Evidence: Single-institution study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, C. Y., & Gonzales, R. (2015). Variation in Follow-Up Visit Practices Across Clinicians and Conditions: Findings From a University Cardiology Practice. Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392815620185

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free